P1racenews AI automatic summary:
Mark Hughes analyses the many uncertainties that decided the outcome of the Las Vegas Grand Prix, plus a crucial piece of suspected gamesmanship by Max Verstappen
Pre-race uncertainties were on everyone’s mind due to limited dry running, with questions about tire graining and fuel consumption being key factors in strategy decisions. The McLaren’s wet weather superiority in qualifying raised speculation about their performance in the dry conditions, alongside considerations of ride height compliance. However, one certainty was Max Verstappen’s ability to maximize the Red Bull’s potential.
Verstappen’s flawless race execution, highlighted by a stellar start catapulting him to the lead and strategic tire management, ultimately secured his victory. While McLaren’s Lando Norris might have had the pace for a win if not for losing ground early in the race, Verstappen’s dominance was undeniable. Mercedes’ George Russell also pushed hard but faced challenges with tire wear on his aggressive second set strategy.
Kimi Antonelli’s impressive fourth-place finish (later podium due to disqualifications) showcased the potential of the zero-stop strategy and strategic tire management. Despite initial setbacks in wet qualifying and on-track incidents, Verstappen’s composed performance contrasted with his competitors’ issues, underscoring his race-winning drive. The importance of a perfect start and tire temperatures in the cold track conditions further emphasized the intricate strategic elements at play.
