F1’s supposed bogeyman doesn’t deserve its reputation

F1’s supposed bogeyman doesn’t deserve its reputation

P1racenews AI automatic summary:


Pirelli is, often, the part of Formula 1 that everyone loves to berate. So it’s little surprise its extended deal as tyre supplier was met by groans in some quarters. But some stereotypes about its role just aren’t right – so is the criticism fair?

The recent announcement of Pirelli continuing as Formula 1’s tyre supplier until 2027, with a possible extension to 2028, has generated some negative comments. However, it is essential to consider the challenges faced by a sole tyre supplier in a championship. Being responsible for providing tyres that work across various circuits, car types, and evolving conditions is no easy task. Pirelli must also meet the demands outlined in the “target letter” to create strategic variety and exciting racing. It is unfair to solely blame the tyres for any underperformance, as they are a neutral component. While Pirelli may not be perfect, it is the only supplier to produce a control product specifically designed for F1. The question remains whether another supplier could deliver a wear-based performance drop-off and achieve greater control over stint lengths. Overall, one must recognize the significant changes that have occurred in F1 during the Pirelli era.

Read the original article

Source: The Race

Related posts